[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100608210000.7692.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:01:44 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] oom: use send_sig() instead force_sig()
Oleg, I parsed your mention mean following patch, correct?
===========================================
Oleg pointed out oom_kill.c has force_sig() abuse. force_sig() mean
ignore signal mask. but SIGKILL itself is not maskable.
So, we can use send_sig() sefely.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index e7d3a5d..599f977 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem)
p->rt.time_slice = HZ;
set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
- force_sig(SIGKILL, p);
+ send_sig(SIGKILL, p, 1);
return 0;
}
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists