lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:58:02 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	cpw@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/uv] x86, UV: Correct BAU discovery of hubs and sockets

Commit-ID:  a8328ee58c15c9d763a67607a35bb987b38950fa
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a8328ee58c15c9d763a67607a35bb987b38950fa
Author:     Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:22:02 -0500
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:13:46 +0200

x86, UV: Correct BAU discovery of hubs and sockets

Correct the initialization-time assumption of contigous blade
numbers and of sockets numbered from zero.

There may be hubs present with no cpu's enabled.
There may be disabled sockets such that the active socket is not
number zero.

And assign a 'socket master' by assuming that a socket is a
node. (it is not safe to extract socket number from an apicid)

Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de
LKML-Reference: <E1OJvNy-0004aW-9S@...09.americas.sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
index 295a411..ab929e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
@@ -1547,11 +1547,13 @@ calculate_destination_timeout(void)
  */
 static void uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
 {
-	int i, j, k;
+	int i;
 	int cpu;
 	int pnode;
 	int uvhub;
 	short socket = 0;
+	unsigned short socket_mask;
+	unsigned int uvhub_mask;
 	struct bau_control *bcp;
 	struct uvhub_desc *bdp;
 	struct socket_desc *sdp;
@@ -1562,7 +1564,7 @@ static void uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
 		short cpu_number[16];
 	};
 	struct uvhub_desc {
-		short num_sockets;
+		unsigned short socket_mask;
 		short num_cpus;
 		short uvhub;
 		short pnode;
@@ -1581,43 +1583,54 @@ static void uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
 		spin_lock_init(&bcp->masks_lock);
 		pnode = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->pnode;
 		uvhub = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->numa_blade_id;
+		uvhub_mask |= (1 << uvhub);
 		bdp = &uvhub_descs[uvhub];
 		bdp->num_cpus++;
 		bdp->uvhub = uvhub;
 		bdp->pnode = pnode;
-		/* kludge: assume uv_hub.h is constant */
-		socket = (cpu_physical_id(cpu)>>5)&1;
-		if (socket >= bdp->num_sockets)
-			bdp->num_sockets = socket+1;
+		/* kludge: 'assuming' one node per socket, and assuming that
+		   disabling a socket just leaves a gap in node numbers */
+		socket = (cpu_to_node(cpu) & 1);;
+		bdp->socket_mask |= (1 << socket);
 		sdp = &bdp->socket[socket];
 		sdp->cpu_number[sdp->num_cpus] = cpu;
 		sdp->num_cpus++;
 	}
-	socket = 0;
-	for_each_possible_blade(uvhub) {
+	uvhub = 0;
+	while (uvhub_mask) {
+		if (!(uvhub_mask & 1))
+			goto nexthub;
 		bdp = &uvhub_descs[uvhub];
-		for (i = 0; i < bdp->num_sockets; i++) {
-			sdp = &bdp->socket[i];
-			for (j = 0; j < sdp->num_cpus; j++) {
-				cpu = sdp->cpu_number[j];
+		socket_mask = bdp->socket_mask;
+		socket = 0;
+		while (socket_mask) {
+			if (!(socket_mask & 1))
+				goto nextsocket;
+			sdp = &bdp->socket[socket];
+			for (i = 0; i < sdp->num_cpus; i++) {
+				cpu = sdp->cpu_number[i];
 				bcp = &per_cpu(bau_control, cpu);
 				bcp->cpu = cpu;
-				if (j == 0) {
+				if (i == 0) {
 					smaster = bcp;
-					if (i == 0)
+					if (socket == 0)
 						hmaster = bcp;
 				}
 				bcp->cpus_in_uvhub = bdp->num_cpus;
 				bcp->cpus_in_socket = sdp->num_cpus;
 				bcp->socket_master = smaster;
+				bcp->uvhub = bdp->uvhub;
 				bcp->uvhub_master = hmaster;
-				for (k = 0; k < DEST_Q_SIZE; k++)
-					bcp->socket_acknowledge_count[k] = 0;
-				bcp->uvhub_cpu =
-				  uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->blade_processor_id;
+				bcp->uvhub_cpu = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->
+						blade_processor_id;
 			}
+nextsocket:
 			socket++;
+			socket_mask = (socket_mask >> 1);
 		}
+nexthub:
+		uvhub++;
+		uvhub_mask = (uvhub_mask >> 1);
 	}
 	kfree(uvhub_descs);
 	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ