[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9277.1275963300@localhost>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:15:00 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, tytso@....edu,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>, hackbod@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:17:13 +0200, Linus Walleij said:
> So I would really like to know from the Android people why the
> binder is in the kernel, after all. Could it *theoretically* be in
> userspace, on top of some unix domain sockets, running as a
> real-time scheduled daemon or whatever, still yielding the same
> performance? Or is there some discovered limitation with current
> interfaces, that everybody ought to know?
Not an Android person, but...
How expensive is a userspace->kernel transition on Android-class hardware?
There's certainly something to be said for short-circuiting the path
source_process -> kernel -> broker_process -> kernel -> dest_process
down to the shorter source->kernel->dest
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists