Message-ID: <000601cb06cd$f48d3bb0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:46:31 +0900
From:	"Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
To:	"Masayuki Ohtak" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew" <andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>,
	"Intel OTC" <joel.clark@...el.com>, "Wang, Qi" <qi.wang@...el.com>,
	"Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Topcliff PHUB: Generate PacketHub driver

Hi Alan

> > Remember here ioctl isn't single threaded so you may want to double check
>
> > some of these
>
> The above copy_from_user is Copy global variable to local variable.
> Thus, We think this code has re-entrant.
The above is not true.
Our ioctl routine is just used under single pthread.

> Hi Andrew
Sorry, I have not checked my email.

Thanks,

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Masayuki Ohtak" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
To: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; "Andrew" <andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>; "Intel OTC"
<joel.clark@...el.com>; "Wang, Qi" <qi.wang@...el.com>; "Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>; "Masayuki Ohtak"
<masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Topcliff PHUB: Generate PacketHub driver


> Hi Alan
>
> We are now updating our Phub driver.
>
> I have a questions for your comment.
>
> (1)
> >> +#ifdef PCH_CAN_PCLK_50MHZ
> >> + /* save clk cfg register */
> >> + g_pch_phub_reg.clkcfg_reg = PCH_READ_REG(CLKCFG_REG_OFFSET);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > This makes it hard to build one kernel for everything
> We couldn't understand your intention.
> Does the above mean we must not use "#ifdef PCH_CAN_PCLK_50MHZ" in source code ?
>
>
> BTW, We show our modification policy the following email with inline.
> Please confirm it.
> If there is any mistake, please inform us.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ohtake.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>
> From: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>
> To: "Masayuki Ohtak" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
>
> Cc: "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; "Andrew" <andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>; "Intel OTC"
<joel.clark@...el.com>; "Wang, Qi" <qi.wang@...el.com>; "Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 12:05 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Topcliff PHUB: Generate PacketHub driver
>
>
>
>
>
> >O> +/* Status Register offset */
>
> >> +#define PHUB_STATUS (0x00)
>
> >> +/* Control Register offset */
>
> >> +#define PHUB_CONTROL (0x04)
>
> >> +/* Time out value for Status Register */
>
> >> +#define PHUB_TIMEOUT (0x05)
>
> >> +/* Enabling for writing ROM */
>
> >> +#define PCH_PHUB_ROM_WRITE_ENABLE (0x01)
>
> >> +/* Disabling for writing ROM */
>
> >> +#define PCH_PHUB_ROM_WRITE_DISABLE (0x00)
>
> >> +/* ROM data area start address offset */
>
> >> +#define PCH_PHUB_ROM_START_ADDR (0x14)
>
> >> +/* MAX number of INT_REDUCE_CONTROL registers */
>
> >> +#define MAX_NUM_INT_REDUCE_CONTROL_REG (128)
>
> >> +
>
> >> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_PCH1_PHUB (0x8801)
>
> >> +
>
> >> +#define PCH_MINOR_NOS (1)
>
> >> +#define CLKCFG_CAN_50MHZ (0x12000000)
>
> >> +#define CLKCFG_CANCLK_MASK (0xFF000000)
>
> >
>
> > Style: constants don't need brackets - might also look more Linux like
>
> > tabbed out a bit
>
> The above brackets are deleted
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +#define PCH_READ_REG(a) ioread32((pch_phub_base_address + a))
>
> >> +
>
> >> +#define PCH_WRITE_REG(a, b) iowrite32(a, (pch_phub_base_address + b))
>
> >
>
> > These on the other hand do - but not where they are now
>
> >
>
> > iowrite32((a), pcb_phub_base_address + (b))
>
> >
>
> > (so that if a or b are expressions they are evaluated first)
>
> Modify like below.
>
> #define PCH_READ_REG(a) ioread32(pch_phub_base_address + (a))
>
> #define PCH_WRITE_REG(a, b) iowrite32(a, pch_phub_base_address + (b))
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >> +struct pch_phub_reg {
>
> >> + u32 phub_id_reg; /* PHUB_ID register val */
>
> >> + u32 q_pri_val_reg; /* QUEUE_PRI_VAL register val */
>
> >> + u32 rc_q_maxsize_reg; /* RC_QUEUE_MAXSIZE register val */
>
> >> + u32 bri_q_maxsize_reg; /* BRI_QUEUE_MAXSIZE register val */
>
> >> + u32 comp_resp_timeout_reg; /* COMP_RESP_TIMEOUT register val */
>
> >> + u32 bus_slave_control_reg; /* BUS_SLAVE_CONTROL_REG register val */
>
> >> + u32 deadlock_avoid_type_reg; /* DEADLOCK_AVOID_TYPE register val */
>
> >> + u32 intpin_reg_wpermit_reg0; /* INTPIN_REG_WPERMIT register 0 val */
>
> >> + u32 intpin_reg_wpermit_reg1; /* INTPIN_REG_WPERMIT register 1 val */
>
> >> + u32 intpin_reg_wpermit_reg2; /* INTPIN_REG_WPERMIT register 2 val */
>
> >> + u32 intpin_reg_wpermit_reg3; /* INTPIN_REG_WPERMIT register 3 val */
>
> >> + /* INT_REDUCE_CONTROL registers val */
>
> >> + u32 int_reduce_control_reg[MAX_NUM_INT_REDUCE_CONTROL_REG];
>
> >> +#ifdef PCH_CAN_PCLK_50MHZ
>
> >> + u32 clkcfg_reg; /* CLK CFG register val */
>
> >> +#endif
>
> >> +} g_pch_phub_reg;
>
> >
>
> > Stylewise the kernel doesn't use the g_ convention that many Windows
>
> > people do, so lose the g_
>
> Delete prefix 'g_'.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +s32 pch_phub_opencount; /* check whether opened or not */
>
> >> +u32 pch_phub_base_address;
>
> >> +u32 pch_phub_extrom_base_address;
>
> >> +s32 pch_phub_suspended;
>
> >
>
> > Any reason these can't be in the struct ?
>
> Move the above 4 variables into 'struct pch_phub_reg_t'.
>
>
>
> >> +
>
> >> +struct device *dev_dbg;
>
> >
>
> > Not a good name for a global variable as it will clash with others
>
> Modify to phub_dev_dbg.
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pch_phub_lock); /* for spin lock */
>
> >
>
> > Can this be static or in the struct ?
>
> Modify lile below.
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pch_phub_lock); /* for spin lock */
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +
>
> >> +/**
>
> >> + * file_operations structure initialization
>
> >> + */
>
> >> +const struct file_operations pch_phub_fops = {
>
> >> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> >> + .open = pch_phub_open,
>
> >> + .release = pch_phub_release,
>
> >> + .ioctl = pch_phub_ioctl,
>
> >> +};
>
> >
>
> > static const ?
>
> >
>
> Modify to 'static const'.
>
>
>
>
>
> >> +/*--------------------------------------------
>
> >> + exported function prototypes
>
> >> +--------------------------------------------*/
>
> >
>
> > They start 'static' I don't think they are exportdd !
>
> Modify comment to 'Internal function prototypes'
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +static int __devinit pch_phub_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
>
> >> +        struct pci_device_id *id);
>
> >> +static void __devexit pch_phub_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>
> >> +static int pch_phub_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state);
>
> >> +static int pch_phub_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>
> >
>
> >> +static struct pci_driver pch_phub_driver = {
>
> >> + .name = "pch_phub",
>
> >> + .id_table = pch_phub_pcidev_id,
>
> >> + .probe = pch_phub_probe,
>
> >> + .remove = __devexit_p(pch_phub_remove),
>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>
> >> + .suspend = pch_phub_suspend,
>
> >> + .resume = pch_phub_resume
>
> >> +#endif
>
> >> +};
>
> >> +
>
> >> +static int __init pch_phub_pci_init(void);
>
> >> +static void __exit pch_phub_pci_exit(void);
>
> >> +
>
> >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PCH PACKET HUB PCI Driver");
>
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> >> +module_init(pch_phub_pci_init);
>
> >> +module_exit(pch_phub_pci_exit);
>
> >> +module_param(pch_phub_major_no, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
>
> >
>
> > If you migrated the module registration/PCI registration to the bottom of
>
> > the file you could avoid the forward declations and make the code easier
>
> > to follow ?
>
> Move the PCI registration code to the bottom of the file.
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +void pch_phub_read_modify_write_reg(unsigned long reg_addr_offset,
>
> >> +        unsigned long data, unsigned long mask)
>
> >> +{
>
> >> + unsigned long reg_addr = pch_phub_base_address + reg_addr_offset;
>
> >> + iowrite32(((ioread32((void __iomem *)reg_addr) & ~mask)) | data,
>
> >> + (void __iomem *)reg_addr);
>
> >
>
> > When you have that many casts in a line it's perhaps a hint you have the
>
> > types wrong initially. At the very least reg_addr should be void __iomem,
>
> > and probably pch_phub_base_address should be
>
> >
>
> > It would probably make sense to pass a pointer to your struct pch_hub_reg
>
> > and use that to hold the base address. Then if you ever get a box with
>
> > two in some future design it won't be a disaster
>
> >
>
> >> +void pch_phub_save_reg_conf(void)
>
> >
>
> > Ditto
>
>  reg_addr/pch_phub_base_address  are defined as 'void __iomem',
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +#ifdef PCH_CAN_PCLK_50MHZ
>
> >> + /* save clk cfg register */
>
> >> + g_pch_phub_reg.clkcfg_reg = PCH_READ_REG(CLKCFG_REG_OFFSET);
>
> >> +#endif
>
> >
>
> > This makes it hard to build one kernel for everything
>
> ???
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> + return;
>
> >> +}
>
> >
>
> >> +void pch_phub_restore_reg_conf(void)
>
> >> +{
>
> >> + u32 i = 0;
>
> >
>
> > Why = 0, if you do that here you may hide initialisation errors from
>
> > future changes ?
>
> Delete '=0'
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +/** pch_phub_read_serial_rom - Implements the functionality of reading Serial
>
> >> + *  ROM.
>
> >> + *  @offset_address: Contains the Serial ROM address offset value
>
> >> + *  @data: Contains the Serial ROM value
>
> >> + */
>
> >> +int pch_phub_read_serial_rom(unsigned long offset_address, unsigned char *data)
>
> >> +{
>
> >> + unsigned long mem_addr = pch_phub_extrom_base_address + offset_address;
>
> >> +
>
> >> + dev_dbg(dev_dbg,
>
> >> + "pch_phub_read_serial_rom:mem_addr=0x%08x\n", (u32)mem_addr);
>
> >> + *data = ioread8((void __iomem *)mem_addr);
>
> >
>
> > Same comments about casts
>
> Please refer the above.(defined as 'void __iomem',)
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >> +int pch_phub_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
>
> >> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>
> >> +{
>
> >> + int ret_value = 0;
>
> >> + struct pch_phub_reqt *p_pch_phub_reqt;
>
> >> + unsigned long addr_offset;
>
> >
>
> > This will change size on 32/64bit boxes makign your copy a bit
>
> > problematic
>
> Modify like belwo,
>
> u64 addr_offset;
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> + p_pch_phub_reqt = (struct pch_phub_reqt *)arg;
>
> >> + ret_value = copy_from_user((void *)&addr_offset,
>
> >> + (void *)&p_pch_phub_reqt->addr_offset,
>
> >> + sizeof(addr_offset));
>
> >> + if (ret_value) {
>
> >
>
> >> + /* End of Access area check */
>
> >
>
> > Remember here ioctl isn't single threaded so you may want to double check
>
> > some of these
>
> The above copy_from_user is Copy global variable to local variable.
> Thus, We think this code has re-entrant.
>
>
> >
>
> >> +struct pch_phub_reqt {
>
> >> + unsigned long addr_offset; /*specifies the register address
>
> >> + offset */
>
> >> + unsigned long data; /*specifies the data */
>
> >> + unsigned long mask; /*specifies the mask */
>
> >
>
> > If they may need to be long make them u64. That way 32 and 64bit systems
>
> > get the same ioctl structure and life is good.
>
> Modify type of addr_offset to u64
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> +};
>
> >> +
>
> >> +/* exported function prototypes */
>
> >> +int pch_phub_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
>
> >> +int pch_phub_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
>
> >> +int pch_phub_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>
> >> +       unsigned long arg);
>
> >
>
> > You have various other functions that are not static - if they should be
>
> > then make them static
>
> Add static description for all of internal functions.
>
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists