[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C0EE5FF.5080003@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:53:19 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Mike Habeck <habeck@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] x86 pci: Add option to not assign BAR's if not already
assigned
On 06/02/2010 08:53 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>
>> That's what I thought, which I guess means my original question to Mike
>> still stands...
>
> I thought the whole reason for this was hotplug; we don't want to
> exhaust I/O space unnecessarily by allocating resources for BARs the
> BIOS didn't assign so we can keep them around for later hotplug
> activity.
>
> If there's some other issue, it's not too late to drop this patch.
>
Okay, now... this means that if a device that the BIOS doesn't know
about, but which needs I/O addresses, then it will work if hotplugged,
but not if it is plugged in on system boot?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists