[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100609102743.GC1150@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:27:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, zhiteng.huang@...el.com,
tim.c.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] para virt interface of perf to support kvm guest os
statistics collection in guest os
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 12:41 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > >> Disabling the watchdog is unfortunate. Why is it necessary?
> > >>
> > > perf always uses NMI, so we disable the nmi_watchdog when a perf_event is
> > > set up in case they might have impact.
> > >
> >
> > Ok. Is that the case for the hardware pmus as well? If so it might be
> > done in common code.
>
> The x86 hardware pmu implementation disables the lapic watchdog too, but
> recent kernels come with a watchdog implementation on top of perf, the old
> lapic one will be depricated.
Note, that code is in -tip, queued for v2.6.36.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists