[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1276084414.2046.1335.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:53:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registering of
events
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:17 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2010-06-09 08:32:30]:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 10:35 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >
> > > Peter, can you please point me to the fix for the floating point
> > > exception patch?
> >
> > Ingo just commited the fix, see tip commit f6ab91add6 (perf: Fix signed
> > comparison in perf_adjust_period()).
>
> Actually this fix was already checked-in but I still see the problem.
>
> When ran gdb on the core, it showed me that it was dumping in
> /usr/lib64/libnewt.so.0.52. in newtScaleSet function.
> My newt lib was of version : newt-0.52.2-15
>
> I am now able to workaround the problem by uninstalling newt-devel.
Ah, ok, then we're talking about two different issues, the patch I
referred to solves a possible /0 in the kernel which triggers easily
with software events because of that unsigned comparison.
I'll have to defer to Arnaldo on the newt issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists