linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 01/17] VFS: introduce helpers for the s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1276098555.5677.131.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:49:15 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	tytso@....edu
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	"Tigran A. Aivazian" <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/17] VFS: introduce helpers for the s_dirty flag

On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 11:44 -0400, tytso@....edu wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:17:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > 
> > > The real issue is that it's almost certainly an overdesign.  Let's
> > > get rid of the bogus uses first and figure out what's happening in
> > > what remains, OK?
> > 
> > That would be good.
> 
> Can we figure out what the new names will be for these accessor
> functions, and then pursuade Linus to be willing to add patch #1 in
> this series to add these accessor functions (without any users for
> these functions, that would wait until the next merge window) to
> 2.6.35-rc3 or -rc4, please?
> 
> It will make life much easier for fs maintainers to merge the patches,
> especially if they've done some cleanup to reduce the bogus places
> where s_dirt was getting set in the first place.  That way I can apply
> my patch to reduce the use of s_dirt[1], then apply a patch I carry in
> my own tree to convert to the new accessor functions without worrying
> about patch conflicts.

Yes, that would be nice, Al?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/