lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006091525250.4506@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:	Salman <sqazi@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be
 reused immediately.



On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Quite possibly. I'd worry about the overflow case a bit, but it's 
> certainly going to get the right value when base << MAX_INT.

Having given it a couple of seconds more thought, I don't think there is 
an overflow case either. All of a/b/base are guaranteed to be non-negative 
(or our pid code is in worse trouble anyway), so there is no overflow 
possible. So yes. Just comparing a-base < b-base should always be safe.

			Linus


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ