lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F2E9EB7348B8264F86B6AB8151CE2D791100848EA1@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:30:37 +0800
From:	"Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"jdike@...ux.intel.com" <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v7 11/19] Use callback to deal with
 skb_release_data() specially.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
>Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 10:56 PM
>To: Xin, Xiaohui
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>mst@...hat.com; mingo@...e.hu; davem@...emloft.net; herbert@...dor.apana.org.au;
>jdike@...ux.intel.com
>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 11/19] Use callback to deal with skb_release_data() specially.
>
>Le samedi 05 juin 2010 à 18:14 +0800, xiaohui.xin@...el.com a écrit :
>> From: Xin Xiaohui <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
>>
>> If buffer is external, then use the callback to destruct
>> buffers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Xiaohui <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Yu <yzhao81new@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  net/core/skbuff.c |   11 +++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index 37587f0..418457c 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -385,6 +385,11 @@ static void skb_clone_fraglist(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>>  static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  {
>> +	/* check if the skb has external buffers, we have use destructor_arg
>> +	 * here to indicate
>> +	 */
>> +	struct skb_external_page *ext_page = skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
>> +
>
>Oh well. This is v7 of your series, and nobody complained yet ?
>
>This is a new cache miss on a _critical_ path.

Ok, I would remove the declaration here to avoid the new cache miss.

>
>
>>  	if (!skb->cloned ||
>>  	    !atomic_sub_return(skb->nohdr ? (1 << SKB_DATAREF_SHIFT) + 1 : 1,
>>  			       &skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref)) {
>> @@ -397,6 +402,12 @@ static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  		if (skb_has_frags(skb))
>>  			skb_drop_fraglist(skb);
>>
>> +		/* if the skb has external buffers, use destructor here,
>> +		 * since after that skb->head will be kfree, in case skb->head
>> +		 * from external buffer cannot use kfree to destroy.
>> +		 */
>
>Why not deferring here the access to skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg ?

And references skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg here.

>
>> +		if (dev_is_mpassthru(skb->dev) && ext_page && ext_page->dtor)
>> +			ext_page->dtor(ext_page);
>>  		kfree(skb->head);
>>  	}
>>  }
>
>if (dev_is_mpassthru(skb->dev)) {
>	struct skb_external_page *ext_page =
>				skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
>	if (ext_page && ext_page->dtor)
>		ext_page->dtor(ext_page);
>}
>
>destructor_arg should me moved before frags[] if you really want to use it.

Thanks for the patch. But why destructor_arg before frags[] is better than after frags[]?
skb_release_data() will reference both of them........

>
>diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>index bf243fc..b136d90 100644
>--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>@@ -202,10 +202,11 @@ struct skb_shared_info {
>         */
>        atomic_t        dataref;
>
>-       skb_frag_t      frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
>        /* Intermediate layers must ensure that destructor_arg
>         * remains valid until skb destructor */
>        void *          destructor_arg;
>+
>+       skb_frag_t      frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
> };
>
> /* We divide dataref into two halves.  The higher 16 bits hold references
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ