[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F2E9EB7348B8264F86B6AB8151CE2D791100848EA1@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:30:37 +0800
From: "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"jdike@...ux.intel.com" <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v7 11/19] Use callback to deal with
skb_release_data() specially.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
>Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 10:56 PM
>To: Xin, Xiaohui
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>mst@...hat.com; mingo@...e.hu; davem@...emloft.net; herbert@...dor.apana.org.au;
>jdike@...ux.intel.com
>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 11/19] Use callback to deal with skb_release_data() specially.
>
>Le samedi 05 juin 2010 à 18:14 +0800, xiaohui.xin@...el.com a écrit :
>> From: Xin Xiaohui <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
>>
>> If buffer is external, then use the callback to destruct
>> buffers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Xiaohui <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Yu <yzhao81new@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> net/core/skbuff.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index 37587f0..418457c 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -385,6 +385,11 @@ static void skb_clone_fraglist(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> + /* check if the skb has external buffers, we have use destructor_arg
>> + * here to indicate
>> + */
>> + struct skb_external_page *ext_page = skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
>> +
>
>Oh well. This is v7 of your series, and nobody complained yet ?
>
>This is a new cache miss on a _critical_ path.
Ok, I would remove the declaration here to avoid the new cache miss.
>
>
>> if (!skb->cloned ||
>> !atomic_sub_return(skb->nohdr ? (1 << SKB_DATAREF_SHIFT) + 1 : 1,
>> &skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref)) {
>> @@ -397,6 +402,12 @@ static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> if (skb_has_frags(skb))
>> skb_drop_fraglist(skb);
>>
>> + /* if the skb has external buffers, use destructor here,
>> + * since after that skb->head will be kfree, in case skb->head
>> + * from external buffer cannot use kfree to destroy.
>> + */
>
>Why not deferring here the access to skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg ?
And references skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg here.
>
>> + if (dev_is_mpassthru(skb->dev) && ext_page && ext_page->dtor)
>> + ext_page->dtor(ext_page);
>> kfree(skb->head);
>> }
>> }
>
>if (dev_is_mpassthru(skb->dev)) {
> struct skb_external_page *ext_page =
> skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
> if (ext_page && ext_page->dtor)
> ext_page->dtor(ext_page);
>}
>
>destructor_arg should me moved before frags[] if you really want to use it.
Thanks for the patch. But why destructor_arg before frags[] is better than after frags[]?
skb_release_data() will reference both of them........
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>index bf243fc..b136d90 100644
>--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>@@ -202,10 +202,11 @@ struct skb_shared_info {
> */
> atomic_t dataref;
>
>- skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
> /* Intermediate layers must ensure that destructor_arg
> * remains valid until skb destructor */
> void * destructor_arg;
>+
>+ skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
> };
>
> /* We divide dataref into two halves. The higher 16 bits hold references
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists