[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100610084707.GG30672@mail.oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:47:07 -0700
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ocfs2: Let ocfs2_setattr use new truncate sequence.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:27:11AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> You just leave the duplicate inode_newsize_ok in, but still have
> one as part of inode_change_ok. See the previous thread - we'll
> need to move inode_change_ok to under the cluster locks, both
> for the truncate and non-truncate case.
Is your concern that the u/gid checks may be against stale ids?
> > + truncate_setsize(inode, attr->ia_size);
>
> But any reason this isn't done inside the
>
> if (size_change && attr->ia_size != inode->i_size) {
>
> conditional above? You'll never get size and uid/gid changes in the
> same request, so there won't be any change in behaviour.
I think the code exists as-is so that the i_size update only
happens after the quota transfer has been approved. Jan added the quota
bits in this location.
I can't see a standard posix op that changes size and ids at the
same time. I think we just add BUG_ON expressions that ensure such a
behavior, right?
Joel
--
"I'm living so far beyond my income that we may almost be said
to be living apart."
- e e cummings
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists