linux-kernel - [PATCH] [0/23] Fix gcc 4.6 set but unused variable warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100610110.764742110@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:10:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [0/23] Fix gcc 4.6 set but unused variable warnings

gcc 4.6 -Wall gained a new set but unused variable warning.

First it was incredibly noisy, but when looking at it in detail it
actually found some bugs.

I haven't tried to fix all occurrences, but
at least the major ones for my configuration.

If someone is interested more work would be possible
on this.

There are still some warnings left, but no flood
and there's really usually some code improvement.

In a few cases I simply shut up the compiler, but
in many other cases dead code is gone or a real
problem has been fixed.

Some of the changes need more review (especially marked
and with suitable cc), but most are straight forward.

I did not fix all bugs -- those that were too hard
are just commented with the warning left in. 
I also marked areas that need more attention in
the individual patches.

Andrew, something for your tree?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/