[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100610135732.GC2410@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:57:32 -0400
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com, mhiramat@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, vgoyal@...hat.com,
sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] jump label v9: convert jump label to use a key
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:43:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:39 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > -static inline int enable_jump_label(const char *name)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline int disable_jump_label(const char *name)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > +#define enable_jump_label(key)
> > +#define disable_jump_label(key)
>
> I would expect enable_jump_label() to look something like:
>
> #define enable_jump_label(cond_var) \
> do { \
> *(cond_var) = 1; \
> } while (0)
>
> That way the HAVE_JUMP_LABEL and !HAVE_JUMP_LABEL code has similar
> effects.
right. I was going to clean that up in a followup. But you are right - I
think it makes the code much clearer. will fix.
thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists