[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1276179319.24373.24.camel@cndougla-ubuntu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:15:19 -0400
From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ia.com>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@...a.fr>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>,
Rafi Rubin <rafi@...s.upenn.edu>,
Michael Poole <mdpoole@...ilus.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: mt: Introduce MT event slots (rev 5)
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 00:30 +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> With the rapidly increasing number of intelligent multi-contact and
> multi-user devices, the need to send digested, filtered information
> from a set of different sources within the same device is imminent.
> This patch adds the concept of slots to the MT protocol. The slots
> enumerate a set of identified sources, such that all MT events
> can be passed independently and selectively per identified source.
>
> The protocol works like this: Instead of sending a SYN_MT_REPORT
> event immediately after the contact data, one sends an ABS_MT_SLOT
> event immediately before the contact data. The input core will only
> emit events for slots with modified MT events. It is assumed that
> the same slot is used for the duration of an initiated contact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
> ---
> Revision 5 incorporates the following changes:
> - Rename the slot event to ABS_MT_SLOT to keep all MT-related events
> in the same namespace.
> - Move the MT slot event list to input.h so that it can be read
> by userspace.
>
> drivers/input/input.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> include/linux/input.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
I was wondering what the status of this patch was. I reviewed it and I
think it's a good improvement of the protocol. I think it will help
simplify things in userspace event handling, and should reduce the noise
in evdev. I also like the incremental approach in that it doesn't force
drivers into the new protocol, but makes it available for them when they
can use it.
Acked-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
Long term, I think it makes the most sense to have a layer inside the
kernel to do software touch tracking and expose all MT data through the
slots protocol instead of it being determined by the capabilities of the
device/driver.
-- Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists