[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1276181571.12038.21.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:52:51 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registering of
events
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 10:35 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >
> > > I tested the patch and it fixed the regression where
> > > perf record -e probe:do_fork -aR sleep 1 would fail.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks! Unfortunately the patch does two things, one is to fix this
> > regression, the other is a clean up. Linus is currently only wanting
> > fixes now and may not accept the clean up part of this patch. Can you
> > test the patch below. It only addresses the regression.
>
>
> I tested this patch on the mainline(latest git), and perf record is able
> to record events. However the other regressions still remain. I am
> seeing these on mainline too.
But this means that the problem that I'm responsible for is fixed with
this patch, correct?
If so, I'll package it up and add your "Tested-by:" tag. OK?
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists