linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201006101744.55754.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:44:55 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...g.hm,
	Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, tytso@....edu,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration

On Thursday, June 10, 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Moreover, having thought a bit more about the "power manager in user space"
> > concept I'm not sure if it really is that better than the original wakelocks
> > idea.  Namely, it only repaces a kernel-based mechanism with a user space
> > task doing basically the same thing, but the communication between that task
> > and the other cooperating user space tasks is arguably more complicated (it
> > also uses the kernel resources, although indirectly).
> 
> That is all true.  The "power manager in userspace" was meant to prove
> a point: that this _could_ be done without invasive changes to the
> kernel.  It wasn't necessarily meant to be a _better_ solution.
> 
> > So, for a phone-like system, where you'd generally want to simplify user space,
> > having a "power manager" in the kernel seems to make sense to me.
> 
> This is a judgment call.  Obviously different people have different 
> opinions.

Agreed.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/