linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of/device: Move struct of_device define outside of CONFIG_OF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:36:10 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/device: Move struct of_device define outside of CONFIG_OF_DEVICE
 test

On 06/09/10 21:54, Grant Likely wrote:
> Some code uses of_device even when CONFIG_OF_DEVICE is not set.  This
> patch makes of_device valid all the time by moving it outside of the
> ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE test.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> ---
> 
> Hi Randy,
> 
> Here's what I applied to my tree to fix the niu driver compile warning.
> I've compile tested it on several architectures, and am pushing it out
> to my linux-next branch now.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>

along with the niu.c patch, of course.

> g.
> 
>  include/linux/of_device.h |   12 +++++-------
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_device.h b/include/linux/of_device.h
> index c877d54..8cd1fe7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_device.h
> @@ -1,13 +1,6 @@
>  #ifndef _LINUX_OF_DEVICE_H
>  #define _LINUX_OF_DEVICE_H
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE
> -#include <linux/device.h>
> -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> -
> -
>  /*
>   * The of_device *was* a kind of "base class" that was a superset of
>   * struct device for use by devices attached to an OF node and probed
> @@ -22,7 +15,12 @@
>   * from the kernel.
>   */
>  #define of_device platform_device
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <asm/of_device.h>
>  
>  #define	to_of_device(d) container_of(d, struct of_device, dev)
> 


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/