[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100611150124.GG12436@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:01:25 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, tytso@....edu,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The one thing that does look difficult is that these power constraints
> > are device (and sometimes SoC) specific. Expressing them in a generic
> > way for the cpu govenors to make sense of might be hard.
> Doesn't the clock framework already handle this sort of thing?
The clock framework is implemented independantly for each CPU.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists