[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100611180446.GA13025@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:04:46 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/5] fix the racy usage of thread_group_cputimer() in
fastpath_timer_check()
fastpath_timer_check()->thread_group_cputimer() is racy and
unneeded.
It is racy because another thread can clear ->running before
thread_group_cputimer() takes cputimer->lock. In this case
thread_group_cputimer() will set ->running = true again and call
thread_group_cputime(). But since we do not hold tasklist or
siglock, we can race with fork/exit and copy the wrong results
into cputimer->cputime.
It is unneeded because if ->running == true we can just use
the numbers in cputimer->cputime we already have.
Change fastpath_timer_check() to copy cputimer->cputime into
the local variable under cputimer->lock. We do not re-check
->running under cputimer->lock, run_posix_cpu_timers() does
this check later.
Note: we can add more optimizations on top of this change.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 35-rc2/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c~6_FPTC_DONT_SET_RUNNING 2010-06-11 01:08:03.000000000 +0200
+++ 35-rc2/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c 2010-06-11 19:40:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -1287,7 +1287,10 @@ static inline int fastpath_timer_check(s
if (sig->cputimer.running) {
struct task_cputime group_sample;
- thread_group_cputimer(tsk, &group_sample);
+ spin_lock(&sig->cputimer.lock);
+ group_sample = sig->cputimer.cputime;
+ spin_unlock(&sig->cputimer.lock);
+
if (task_cputime_expired(&group_sample, &sig->cputime_expires))
return 1;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists