[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100611181724.GC9946@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:17:24 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Do not call ->writepage[s] from direct reclaim
and use a_ops->writepages() where possible
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:30:26PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:33:20PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Ok, I was under the mistaken impression that filesystems wanted to be
> > given ranges of pages where possible. Considering that there has been no
> > reaction to the patch in question from the filesystem people cc'd, I'll
> > drop the problem for now.
>
> Yes, we'd prefer them if possible. Then again we'd really prefer to
> get as much I/O as possible from the flusher threads, and not kswapd.
>
Ok, for the moment I'll put it on the maybe pile and drop it from the
series. We can revisit if a use is found for it and we're happy that
there wasn't some other bug leaving dirty pages on the LRU for too long.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists