[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinkhXQfE9Ejcb3dJeMZWl6gxbO3-gzqPUBxei4N@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:11:38 -0400
From: Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 V2] [tip:x86/mm] Correcting improper large page
preservation
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug in try_preserve_large_page() which may result
> in improper large page preservation and improper application of page
> attributes to the memory area outside of the original change request.
> More specifically, the problem manifests itself when set_memory_*() is
> called for several pages at the beginning of the large page and
> try_preserve_large_page() erroneously concludes that the change can be
> applied to whole large page.
> The fix consists of 3 parts:
> 1. addition of "required" protection attributes in
> static_protections(), so .data and .bss can be guaranteed to stay "RW"
> 2. static_protections() is now called for every small page within
> large page to determine compatibility of new protection attributes
> (instead of just small pages within the requested range).
> 3. large page can be preserved only if attribute change is
> large-page-aligned and covers whole large page.
>
> V1: try_preserve_large_page() patch for Linux 2.6.34-rc2
> V2: replaced pfn check with address check for kernel rw-data
>
> Signed-off-by: Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xuxian Jiang <jiang@...ncsu.edu>
> Reviewed-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> ---
Does anyone have any feedback on this patch set?
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists