| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100611194812.GD3018@think> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:48:12 -0400 From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:43:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote: > > > > The master branch of the btrfs-unstable tree is a collection of fixes > > and cleanups, including two btrfs regressions from rc1: > > Ok, no pulling then. See all the millions of threads how I wanted only > critical fixes for -rc3 since I'll be offline. > > You have a couple of hours for a minimal fix pull request with just > the regression fixes if you want to hit -rc3. Then I'll cut a release > and be gone for a while. I did limit this to actual fixes, the only pure cleanups are a commit from Andi that drops unused code (fixing warnings from gcc), one to fix a sparse warning in ioctl.c, and fixing a gcc warning in tree_search. The others all fix oopsen or big problems, and I think fixing warnings helps avoid false negatives as others look for real problems? I'm happy to rebase out the 3 non-criticals. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists