linux-kernel - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cache line on newer core 2/Xeon Arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100610.222006.242136751.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cache line
 on newer core 2/Xeon Arch

From: "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:55:16 -0700

> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> 
>> But... L1_CACHE_BYTES is 64 on MCORE2, so this matches current
>> NET_SKB_PAD definition...
>> 
>> #ifndef NET_SKB_PAD
>> #define NET_SKB_PAD 64
>> #endif
>
> I admit the current definition is redundant, but NET_SKB_PAD had
> been 32 until your recent change of the value, and prior to 2.6.30
> the value was 16.  If the value were to change again it would
> silently break the cacheline alignment which is provided by this
> patch.  If we were to define NET_SKB_PAD using L1_CACHE_BYTES in
> skbuff.h then I might be more inclined to to pull the NET_SKB_PAD
> change, but right now I would prefer to treat NET_SKB_PAD as a magic
> number that coincidently is the same size as the L1 cache on MCORE2.

Eric, why don't we do that?  Make NET_SKB_PAD's define L1_CACHE_BYTES.

Reading the comments you added when the default value was changed to
64, this seems to even be your overall intent. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/