[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C11D51E.3080909@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:18:06 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com, mhiramat@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, vgoyal@...hat.com,
sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] jump label v9: x86 support
On 06/10/2010 05:14 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:39 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>>> + select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL if !CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
>>
>> That deserves a comment somewhere, it basically makes OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
>> useless...
>
> Hm, we need more than a comment for that - distros enable CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> all the time, for the massive kernel image (and hotpath cache footprint)
> savings. Is this fixable?
>
Actually the current reports from the gcc community is that gcc 4.5.0 +
-Os produces a broken kernel even without asm goto:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44129
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists