linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Extend support to future families

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C13D051.4060903@zytor.com>
Date:	Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:22:09 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Extend support to future families

On 06/11/2010 09:15 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> Not yet. And I'm assuming you're driving at tagging it for -stable?
> If yes, I think a stable tag makes sense since this way the distros
> will pick it up more easily and we most definitely will need to do the
> backport later otherwise.
> 
> Do you need another version with the stable tag resent or is it easier
> for you to edit the commit message of the one you have already?
> 

No, I'm not -- Linus is being really snippy about wanting regressions
only this cycle, which this is not.  Once .35 is out you can talk to
Greg about -stable.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/