[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1276335866.2077.3097.camel@twins>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:44:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf: Ability to enable in a paused mode
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 09:34 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> struct pmu {
> int (*enable) (struct perf_event *event);
> + /*
> + * Reserve acts like enable, except the event must go in a "pause"
> + * state. Ie: it is scheduled but waiting to be started
> + * with the ->start() callback.
> + */
> + int (*reserve) (struct perf_event *event);
> void (*disable) (struct perf_event *event);
Urgh, so then we have, enable(), reserve() and start(), that's just too
much. Also, you need to visit all pmu implementations if you touch
struct pmu like that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists