[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:16:34 +0100
From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'...
When halting 2.6.35-rc3 compiled on ARM with debugging, the kernel
warns [1] about the reboot_mutex being taken at kernel/sys.c:392 [2]
and held across do_exit() since kernel_power_off() doesn't necessarily
stop execution.
Does it make sense to annotate the reboot_mutex lock or is another
approach suggested?
Daniel
--- [1]
=====================================
[ BUG: lock held at task exit time! ]
-------------------------------------
halt/3874 is exiting with locks still held!
1 lock held by halt/3874:
#0: (reboot_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c0070424>] sys_reboot+0x98/0x1c4
stack backtrace:
[<c003ab58>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xe8) from [<c04ba3f0>]
(dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[<c04ba3f0>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c) from [<c008aea8>]
(debug_check_no_locks_held+0x74/)
[<c008aea8>] (debug_check_no_locks_held+0x74/0x90) from [<c0063dfc>]
(do_exit+0x570/0x)
[<c0063dfc>] (do_exit+0x570/0x5ec) from [<c00704a8>] (sys_reboot+0x11c/0x1c4)
[<c00704a8>] (sys_reboot+0x11c/0x1c4) from [<c0036040>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c)
--- [2] kernel/sys.c
SYSCALL_DEFINE4(reboot, int, magic1, int, magic2, unsigned int, cmd,
void __user *, arg)
{
...
mutex_lock(&reboot_mutex);
...
case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF:
kernel_power_off();
do_exit(0);
break;
...
mutex_unlock(&reboot_mutex);
...
}
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists