linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C1648AD.5020607@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:20:13 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
CC:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

On 06/14/2010 08:11 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> 
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote at 16:39:00
>> I assume you did a `make clean' in between?
> ...
>> BTW, I'm also using ccache. Always. Ever. All my (cross)compilers are
> Well, I'm unsure - might be I made that mistake, especially b/c I use ccache 
> too since years and didn't experienced any fault so far.

I have certainly seen a number of cases where ccache doesn't pick up
sublte differences, for reasons unknown.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/