linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:42:40 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.L-H@....de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I doubt
>> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()

I think we've crossed wires.  By second patch I mean the patch that
changes OF code.  That change has absolutely no bearing on the
flexcop-pci driver.  The patch to the flexcop-pci driver looks correct
to me, but it is completely unrelated to the OF badness.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/