linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2] x86, pci: Handle fallout pci devices with peer root bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100614111425.7fb143f9@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:14:25 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Graham Ramsey <ramsey.graham@...world.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>,
	Joseph Chan <JosephChan@....com.tw>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86, pci: Handle fallout pci devices with peer root
 bus

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:47:59 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com> wrote:

> 
> Graham bisected
> |    commit 3e3da00c01d050307e753fb7b3e84aefc16da0d0
> |    x86/pci: AMD one chain system to use pci read out res
> 
> cause the SND_HDA_INTEL doesn't work anymore.
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16007
> 
> It turns out that his system with via chipset only have one hypertransport
> chain, but does have one extra orphan device 80:01.0
> 
>  PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
>  PCI: Discovered primary peer bus 80 [IRQ]
> 
>  node 0 link 0: io port [1000, ffffff]
>  TOM: 0000000080000000 aka 2048M
>  node 0 link 0: mmio [e0000000, efffffff]
>  node 0 link 0: mmio [a0000, bffff]
>  node 0 link 0: mmio [80000000, ffffffff]
>  bus: [00, ff] on node 0 link 0
> 
> Try to make peer root buses to share same mmio/io resources if those peer root
> buses fall into the same bus range.
> 
> Also need to update insert_resource to avoid insert same resource two times.

So 3e3da00c01d050307e753fb7b3e84aefc16da0d0 was supposed to address the
case where some laptop RAM ranges ended up incorrect.  Would using _CRS
on those machines also address that problem?  If so, we should consider
dropping amd_bus.c like we did with intel_bus.c.

Yinghai, do you still have people from the RAM bug that could test
using _CRS data?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/