linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/30] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1276551467-21246-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:37:19 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jeff@...zik.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/30] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0

ACPI works need to be executed on cpu0 and acpi/osl.c achieves this by
creating singlethread workqueue and then binding it to cpu0 from a
work which is quite unorthodox.  Make it create regular workqueues and
use queue_work_on() instead.  This is in preparation of concurrency
managed workqueue and the extra workers won't be a problem after it's
implemented.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/osl.c |   40 +++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 78418ce..46cce39 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -191,36 +191,11 @@ acpi_status __init acpi_os_initialize(void)
 	return AE_OK;
 }
 
-static void bind_to_cpu0(struct work_struct *work)
-{
-	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(0));
-	kfree(work);
-}
-
-static void bind_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
-{
-	struct work_struct *work;
-
-	work = kzalloc(sizeof(struct work_struct), GFP_KERNEL);
-	INIT_WORK(work, bind_to_cpu0);
-	queue_work(wq, work);
-}
-
 acpi_status acpi_os_initialize1(void)
 {
-	/*
-	 * On some machines, a software-initiated SMI causes corruption unless
-	 * the SMI runs on CPU 0.  An SMI can be initiated by any AML, but
-	 * typically it's done in GPE-related methods that are run via
-	 * workqueues, so we can avoid the known corruption cases by binding
-	 * the workqueues to CPU 0.
-	 */
-	kacpid_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("kacpid");
-	bind_workqueue(kacpid_wq);
-	kacpi_notify_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("kacpi_notify");
-	bind_workqueue(kacpi_notify_wq);
-	kacpi_hotplug_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("kacpi_hotplug");
-	bind_workqueue(kacpi_hotplug_wq);
+	kacpid_wq = create_workqueue("kacpid");
+	kacpi_notify_wq = create_workqueue("kacpi_notify");
+	kacpi_hotplug_wq = create_workqueue("kacpi_hotplug");
 	BUG_ON(!kacpid_wq);
 	BUG_ON(!kacpi_notify_wq);
 	BUG_ON(!kacpi_hotplug_wq);
@@ -766,7 +741,14 @@ static acpi_status __acpi_os_execute(acpi_execute_type type,
 	else
 		INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
 
-	ret = queue_work(queue, &dpc->work);
+	/*
+	 * On some machines, a software-initiated SMI causes corruption unless
+	 * the SMI runs on CPU 0.  An SMI can be initiated by any AML, but
+	 * typically it's done in GPE-related methods that are run via
+	 * workqueues, so we can avoid the known corruption cases by always
+	 * queueing on CPU 0.
+	 */
+	ret = queue_work_on(0, queue, &dpc->work);
 
 	if (!ret) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
-- 
1.6.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/