[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100614221124.GA22801@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:24 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, bphilips@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] usb: use IRQ watching
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:52:10PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 06/14/2010 11:41 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > So if there's a routing problem, it turns into a polled interrupt? Do
> > we really want that?
>
> Oh yeah, I really want that for libata. Routing is only part of the
> problem and flaky IRQ is something we have to learn to cope with.
>
> > I wonder how long people will run without realizing that there are
> > problems with their system if their devices still work.
>
> I think things would be better this way. If the drives (both cd and
> hard) / input devices are not accessible, most people would simply
> give up rather than reporting, and many cases are transient problems
> which happen only once in the blue moon.
>
> It would be great if some kind of automatic reporting can be used
> (similar to kerneloops?). Hmm... maybe make the warnings scarier?
If you throw a WARN(), then kerneloops will pick it up, so you should be
fine there.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists