| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:52:33 +0200 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: concurrency managed workqueue, take#5 On 06/15/2010 12:49 AM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 00:44 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On 06/15/2010 12:35 AM, Daniel Walker wrote: >>> What is you definition of "concurrency" ? and explain try to explain it >>> in terms of your patchset. >> >> How many workers are concurrently executing? What else? Eh... I'll >> write up another summary tomorrow. Let's talk it there. > > I'd suggest If you write up another description try to not use the word > concurrency .. That term can be used for all sorts of things, and it > doesn't covey enough detail for anyone to know what your implementation > is actually doing. So is "manage" and "level of concurrency" is often used to describe exactly this type of property. I'll try to be clear. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists