linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: ioremap: fix physical address check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C15F043.8060304@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:02:59 +0900
From:	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: ioremap: fix physical address check

(2010/06/14 17:23), Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> (2010/06/14 15:38), Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>>
>>> - Architectural limit of physical address in x86 32-bit mode is 40-bit
>>> (depnds on processor version).
>>
>> According to documentation I happen to have handy this limit is actually
>> 52 bits (and space is currently available in the data structures used for
>> a possible future extension up to 63 bits).
>
> Thank you for pointing it out. I misunderstood that.
>
> Now I think I need to add additional check to see if specified
> physical address can be handled by x86 ioremap(), instead of
> changing phys_addr_valid(). The code would be
>
> static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(...)
> {
> ...
> #if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) && defined(CONFIG_X86_PAE)
> if (phys_addr is higer than 36-bit) {
> printk(KERN_INFO "ioremap can't map physical address %llx\n",
> return NULL;
> }
> #endif
> ...
> }

Please ignore above again. Sorry for inconvenient.
According to the comment from H. Peter Anvin, 36-bit limit is on
RAM in 32-bit mode. So this approach is wrong.

Now I guess there is a bug that doesn't handle physical address
higher than 32-bit properly somewhere...

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/