[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19477.63136.664249.167207@ipc1.ka-ro>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:30:08 +0200
From: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 08:39 +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > All implementations so far use spin_lock_irq_save()!
>
> Nothing prevents your implementation to be a tad smarter.
>
I vote for consistency, so that device drivers can be kept arch
independent instead of having to care about implentation details of
each arch.
Lothar Waßmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@...o-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists