[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1276604794.19810.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:56:34 +0530
From: Philby John <pjohn@...sta.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Fix bug using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
ubi_bgt1d kthread
Hello Jamie,
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 16:04 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Philby John wrote:
> > mtd: Fix bug using smp_processor_id() in preemptible ubi_bgt1d kthread
> >
> > On a MIPS Cavium Octeon CN5020 when trying to create a UBI volume,
> > on the NOR flash, the kernel thread ubi_bgt1d calls
> > cfi_amdstd_write_buffers() --> do_write_buffer() -->
> > INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY --> __udelay(). Its __udelay() that calls
> > smp_processor_id() in preemptible code, which you are not supposed to.
> > Fix the problem by disabling preemption.
>
> The MTD code just calls udelay().
> Are you sure it isn't permitted to call udelay() from preemptible code?
> I think it is fine.
>
> Perhaps MIPS udelay() should be disabling preemption itself, or
> (as x86 does) using raw_smp_processor_id() instead?
Sorry for the noise. I now find that raw_smp_processor_id() has been
implemented specific to MIPS in the latest kernel, I was using 2.6.32.
Thanks and regards,
Philby
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists