[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100614184544.32b1c371.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:45:44 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] vmscan: Write out dirty pages in batch
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:16:29 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> Would it be hard to add a "please flush this file"
> way to call the filesystem flushing threads?
Passing the igrab()bed inode into the flusher threads would fix the
iput_final() problems, as long as the alloc_pages() caller never blocks
indefinitely waiting for the work which the flusher threads are doing.
Otherwise we get (very hard-to-hit) deadlocks where the alloc_pages()
caller holds VFS locks and is waiting for the flusher threads while all
the flusher threads are stuck under iput_final() waiting for those VFS
locks.
That's fixable by not using igrab()/iput(). You can use lock_page() to
pin the address_space. Pass the address of the locked page across to
the flusher threads so they don't try to lock it a second time, or just
use trylocking on that writeback path or whatever.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists