[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100615114058.32e58afd@bike.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:40:58 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, bphilips@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] irq: implement irq_schedule_poll()
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:31:32 +0200
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Implement and use irq_schedule_poll() to schedule desc->poll_timer
> instead of calling mod_timer directly. irq_schedule_poll() is called
> with desc->lock held and schedules the timer iff necessary - ie. if
> the timer is offline or scheduled to expire later than requested.
> This will be used to share desc->poll_timer.
One quick question...
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> index 0bce0e3..0b8fd0a 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ enum {
>
> /* IRQ polling common parameters */
> IRQ_POLL_INTV = HZ / 100, /* from the good ol' 100HZ tick */
> +
> + IRQ_POLL_SLACK = HZ / 1000, /* 10% slack */
> };
Why would IRQ_POLL_SLACK be anything other than zero for HZ < 1000?
It seems like you'd get no slack at all on most systems. Am I missing
something?
Thanks,
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists