[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C18F906.5060805@bitmath.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:17:10 +0200
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ia.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@...a.fr>,
Rafi Rubin <rafi@...s.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] input: evdev: Dynamic buffers (rev4)
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
>>> This version implements buffer locking using event_lock as you
>>> suggested, such that we can proceed with fixing the evdev buffer
>>> problem independently from providing a suitable one-to-many buffer.
>>>
>>> The first patch converts the per-client buffers to a common buffer,
>>> and adds a fixme since the code is expected to be further
>>> improved. The second and third patch includes your review comments.
>> Henrik,
>>
>> Applied to .36 queue with minor adjustments, please take a peek in my
>> 'for-linus' branch and see if you spot anything wrong.
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I guess you forgot to push it to kernel.org? Last change I see in your
> tree is 6 days old.
>
> Thanks,
>
... which seems like a lucky strike; the patch has a blatant security hole,
leaking grabbed events to listening clients after ungrab. I sent an updated
patch to Dmitry earlier today, in a brown paper bag. Not knowing if the original
patch was actually applied or not, I thought I had better hold on to the change
just a little bit.
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists