[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1276713664.9309.177.camel@m0nster>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:41:04 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, mingo@...e.hu, awalls@...ix.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 20:31 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> [tweak scheduling priority of a worker thread]
> > Let say I have a high priority
> > thread in userspace , and I discover through analysis that my thread is
> > being forced to wait on a workqueue thread (priority inversion) , so
> > then I just increase the workqueue thread priority to overcome the
> > inversion. That's totally valid, and you don't even need to know exactly
> > what the thread is doing..
>
> I suspect the _actual_ problem to solve here is not that of proper
> scheduling priorities but that of having to meet deadlines.
I think the workqueue would need to be adjust somehow even in terms of
deadlines. Like you'll miss your deadline unless the workqueue runs.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists