[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100616195801.GC24382@shell>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:58:01 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] d_ino considered harmful
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:10:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010 20:59:13 Valerie Aurora wrote:
> > @@ -91,7 +91,9 @@ static int fillonedir(void * __buf, const char * name, int namlen, loff_t offset
> >
> > if (buf->result)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - d_ino = ino;
> > + /* Use of d_ino without st_dev is always buggy. */
> > + d_ino = 0;
> > +
> > if (sizeof(d_ino) < sizeof(ino) && d_ino != ino) {
> > buf->result = -EOVERFLOW;
> > return -EOVERFLOW;
>
> Isn't this just the path taken by sys_oldreaddir?
>
> Glibc (at least on my box) translates all user calls to readdir into
> sys_getdents or sys_getdents64, so I think you'd also need to change
> filldir() and filldir64() for your testing.
You're right. I changed both code paths in the new version, and
actually tested this time.
Thanks,
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists