[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100616205332.GB15837@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:53:32 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Driver core: reduce duplicated code
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:05:00AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > This makes the two similar functions platform_device_register_simple
> > and platform_device_register_data one line inline functions using a new
> > generic function platform_device_register_resndata.
> I forgot to add some comments to this mail, ... sorry.
>
> - I'm not completely happy with the name of the new function. If
> someone has a better name please tell me.
I don't like it either, what is "resndata" supposed to stand for?
> - can platform_device_register_resndata be moved to __init_or_module?
I doubt it, but try it and see if a build warns about it.
> - I moved the kernel docs to the header but didn't test if they are
> picked up when generating docs. Even if not, there is no better
> place, is there?
No, that's the proper place, but make sure the docbook source is also
picking up the .h file, I don't know if it currently does.
So, I'll not apply this one just yet. Can you verify the docbook stuff
at the very least?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists