[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C181AFD.5060503@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:29:49 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] vmscan: Do not writeback pages in direct reclaim
On 06/15/2010 08:17 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:16:01 +0100
> Mel Gorman<mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
>> But in turn, where is mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim called from direct
>> reclaim? It appears to be only called from the fault path or as a result
>> of the memcg changing size.
>>
> yes. It's only called from
> - page fault
> - add_to_page_cache()
>
> I think we'll see no stack problem. Now, memcg doesn't wakeup kswapd for
> reclaiming memory, it needs direct writeback.
Of course, a memcg page fault could still be triggered
from copy_to_user or copy_from_user, with a fairly
arbitrary stack frame above...
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists