[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C19E023.2040403@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:43:15 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/9] create aggregate kvm_total_used_mmu_pages value
On 06/16/2010 06:06 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
>
>>> +static inline void kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm, int nr)
>>> +{
>>> + kvm->arch.n_used_mmu_pages += nr;
>>> + kvm_total_used_mmu_pages += nr;
>>>
>>>
>> Needs an atomic operation, since there's no global lock here. To avoid
>> bouncing this cacheline around, make the variable percpu and make
>> readers take a sum across all cpus. Side benefit is that you no longer
>> need an atomic but a local_t, which is considerably cheaper.
>>
> That's a good point. All of the modifications are done under locks, but
> the fast path isn't any more. I'll fix it up.
>
>
Note, even before you moved the shrinker out of the lock, this was a
problem. kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages() is called not just from the shrinker
code, we zap pages for other reasons as well.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists