[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100617103747.GZ20317@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:37:47 -0400
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PROVE_RCU breaks proprietary modules (rcu_lock_map)
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:40:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > I am comfortable with PROVE_RCU being incompatible with non-GPL modules.
> > > After all, it is only a debugging option, not intended for production use.
> >
> > I agree completely. I just wanted to publish that fact because it seems
> > to be little known and can be quite a puzzler.
>
> And I do very much appreciate your publicizing the solution! ;-)
>
Hi Paul,
(Sorry I didn't bring this up until now.)
I don't really have any sympathy for people who use that crud, but from
my POV it's going to generate some grief. Fedora builds rawhide with a
lot of debugging options enabled in order to try and hit issues early
before kernels release.
A few weeks ago, I noticed a report that PROVE_RCU was breaking some
non-GPL junk. Digging a bit further, I noticed quite a number of more
reports of this.
Is there any chances you could reconsider this? Otherwise I'll probably
disable the option in Fedora's debug kernels as well if I continue to
see confused users.
--Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists