[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100617104623.GB25567@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:46:23 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in
shrink_page_list()
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 04:48:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:17:50 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
>
> > shrink_page_list() sets up a pagevec to release pages as according as they
> > are free. It uses significant amounts of stack on the pagevec. This
> > patch adds pages to be freed via pagevec to a linked list which is then
> > freed en-masse at the end. This avoids using stack in the main path that
> > potentially calls writepage().
> >
>
> hm, spose so. I cen't see any trivial way to eliminate the local
> pagevec there.
>
> > + if (pagevec_count(&freed_pvec))
> > + __pagevec_free(&freed_pvec);
> > ...
> > - if (pagevec_count(&freed_pvec))
> > - __pagevec_free(&freed_pvec);
>
> That's an open-coded pagevec_free().
>
Fair point, will correct. Thanks
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists