[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100617090229.543af62c@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:02:29 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...e.hu,
bphilips@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, gregkh@...e.de, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] irq: implement IRQ expecting
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:54:48 +0200
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Crazy devices too but I think they would
> fall in a single tick any way.
not sure what ticks have to do with anything but ok ;)
> At any rate, let's say I have those
> numbers, how would I feed it into c-state selection?
if we have this, we need to put a bit of glue in the backend that
tracks (per cpu I suppose) the shortest expected interrupt, which
the C state code then queries.
(and in that regard, it does not matter if shortest expected is
computed via heuristic on a per irq basis, or passed in).
mapping an irq to a cpu is not a 100% science (since interrupts can
move in theory), but just assuming that the irq will happen on the same
CPU it happened last time is more than good enough.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists