[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100617084452.FB39.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:51:34 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] oom: use same_thread_group instead comparing ->mm
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:34:02PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Now, oom are using "child->mm != p->mm" check to distinguish subthread.
> > But It's incorrect. vfork() child also have the same ->mm.
> >
> > This patch change to use same_thread_group() instead.
>
> Hmm. I think we don't use it to distinguish subthread.
> We use it for finding child process which is not vforked.
>
> I can't understand your point.
Thank you. my fault. respin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists