[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100617163332.GB29824@bicker>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:33:33 +0200
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, pat: freeing invalid memtype messages
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 03:45:59PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Commit 20413f27163 "x86, pat: Fix memory leak in free_memtype" added an
> > error message in free_memtype() if rbt_memtype_erase() returns NULL.
> > The problem is that if CONFIG_X86_PAT is enabled, we use a different
> > implimentation of rbt_memtype_erase() that always returns NULL.
> >
> > I've modified rbt_memtype_erase() to return an ERR_PTR() on errors and
> > made free_memtype() check for that instead.
> >
> > Addresses: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
>
> This patch is probably ok, but it does not address my bug.
> I have CONFIG_X86_PAT=y, so rbt_memtype_erase does not always return NULL.
>
Uh. Yeah. Crap. I'm an idiot.
regrds,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists