[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100617173817.GA17523@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:38:17 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ddutile@...hat.com" <ddutile@...hat.com>,
"sheng@...ux.intel.com" <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
> /* vector callbacks are better than PCI interrupts to receive event
^V
> * channel notifications because we can receive vector callbacks on any
> * vcpu and we don't need PCI support or APIC interactions */
^.
>
> is it good enough?
Just two things..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists